Peter Doherty

Peter Doherty
<3

Tuesday 17 May 2011

Week 8-Industrialisation, Modernism and architecture.

Eiffel Tower (La Tour Eiffel)
December 31 2009, posted by Randy 
1. -the importance of the design and construction
With the Eiffel Tower it was named after designer and engineer Alexandre Gustave Eiffel in the period of 1887-1889. It was the worlds tallest manmade building for 41years. It was designed for the Paris Exposition in 1889 (an event for the 100th anniversary of the French revolution). The Eiffel Tower was made out of puddle iron, it has restaurants on the second level and elevators as well. It is one of the most famous structures of all time and is a big symbol for Europe. It is funny that in the time it was being built people hated the idea of it and thought it would ruin the beautiful city of Paris and where as today and in the past it has been on of the most visited sites in Europe, creating a great profit for tourists in Paris. In the time it was being built ‘many in the arts and civic leaders felt the tower was an abomination.’ "They have only erected the framework of this monument, It has no skin" (The Eiffel Tower, 1889, n.d). People did not like the structure at first because it was alien like and had broken the architects rules and normality of regular stone buildings with. 
2. -significance of the materials 
An expert on the characteristics of various metals by this point in his career, Eiffel had decided that wrought iron was the only available material that would provide the necessary combination of strength, flexibility, durability and affordability to make his design a reality. (The Construction of the Eiffel Tower, Karen Plumley). The significance of the material 
3. -significance of the designer
Alexandre Gustave Eiffel was a bridge builder and engineer which therefore allowed him to put his skills of practicality and sustainability to the test of making something attractive, big and useful for the future. He succeeded in the way that the Eiffel tower is still standing strong and how many people used his idea of steel for a different kind of modern beauty and height later on and still today people use. 
4. -function for which each was built
The Tower was built for an event for the 100th French Revolution anniversary, the people did not like the steel look and shape. Many other buildings were torn down after the fair. 
5. -function now-has it changed?
The building has now become a tourist attraction and a symbol for Paris therefore it has changed because people used to hate the look and image of the Eiffel tower and thought it ruined the historic stone buildings and was alien like. It was also designed for a anniversary and was one of the only steel buildings that didn’t get torn down. 

Guggenheim Museum, Bilbao


Monday, November 1st, 2010

'hailed as the most important structure of its time'
( www. guggenheim.org/bilbao )
The Guggenheim Museum was designed by architect Frank Gehry and built by Ferrovial (a Spanish multinational company involved in the design, build, financing, operation (DBFO) and maintenance of transport, urban and services infrastructure.) The museum is in Bilbao in Spain and sits next to the Nervion River. It is a very famous and ‘admired works of contemporary architecture’ ‘The museum was the building most frequently named as one of the most important works completed since 1980 in the 2010 World Architecture Survey among architecture experts.’ (Guggenheim Museum Bilbao, Wikipedia) 
1. -the importance of the design and construction
It is intended to resemble a ship and has random curves which is designed to catch the different light. It was opened in 1997. Architect Phillip Johnson called it "the greatest building of our time" (Guggenheim Museum Bilbao, Wikipedia, n.d). The titanium panels are said to resemble fish scales. Over 10million people have visited the museum. The design and construction was on a time and budget. The importance of the design and construction was to emphasize the surroundings where it was placed such as the river therefore the building was designed to have organic shapes and the resemblance of fish and ship-like features to fit in with the idea of the river it is next to. I think personally that also a fact of the importance of the design is that it allows the mind to feel creative and open minded before entering the museum, it creates a great sense of space well-used which is inspiring and is a piece of art itself. ‘Also in typical Gehry fashion, the building is uniquely a product of the period's technology. Computer aided design and visualizations were used heavily in the structure's design. Computer simulations of the building's structure made it feasible to build shapes that architects of earlier eras would have found nearly impossible to construct. During its construction, stone panels were cut by lasers.’ (Guggenheim Museum, Bilbao, n.d). Revolutionary innovations in construction and project design offered by new digital technologies, coupled with the development of new materials, have enabled architects to create buildings with the most unusual and evocative shapes. (ArchiSculpture, Guggenheim Bilbao Museum, n.d). 
2. -significance of the materials
In the Guggenheim Museum, there are many materials used for the building such as a steel frame with sinuous stone, glass and titanium orthogonal and organic volumes also limestone was used for colour and to match the sandstone of the University Deusto. ‘The titanium cladding used is half a millimeter thick, each piece is unique and has been designed with the aid of a state-of-the-art 3D design computer program. The volumes are linked by glass curtain walls for light transparency. In some of the more curvaceous and irregular exhibition spaces within the museum the floor is constructed of cement with curved and twisted walls.’ I think that the importance of the materials used for this museum would be the computer technology because in the past this would have been a project that would have been impossible to create for architects in the past. 
3. -significance of the designer
Frank Gehry is known for his sculptural buildings and for this building it has been said that he is ‘the most important architect of our age’ by Vanity Fair. His best known work is the Guggenheim Museum. His architectural style is Deconstructionism (a development of post modern architecture that began in the late 1980s. It is characterized by ideas of fragmentation, an interest in manipulating ideas of a structure's surface or skin, non-rectilinear shapes which serve to distort and dislocate some of the elements of architecture, such as structure and envelope.) (Deconstructionism, Wikipedia, n.d). in 2010 he won the World Architecture Survey. In 1999, he was awarded the AIA Gold Medal "in recognition of a significant body of work of lasting influence on the theory and practice of architecture." He is very much inspired by fish and has his own line of jewelery, therefore showing he is very established. Frank Gehry is a significant important designer because he has showed the youth and generations of up and coming architects that there are no limits to creativity and how you can make your designs possible. 
4. -function for which each was built
The function was for architect Frank Gehry to build something new and innovative to put modern art, exhibitions and lecture rooms in a building for people to come and learn and see talent. This function stays the same today for people. With over 10million people have visited. 
http://www.bilbao.net/cs/Satellite?pagename=Bilbaonet/Page/BIO_preHome



Compare the two architectural structures, by noting their similarities and differences.
1. Similarities
The similarities between the Guggenheim Museum and the Eiffel tower are that they both has to be made out of material that could curve, bend and with flexibility so that they could get the curves and arches that they wanted. Similar materials used were steel and iron for durability, strength and flexibility. The designers have some similarities but some differences also for an example the both were thinking about the future when they were designing, because Eiffel was using completely different materials and a completely different style than the norm in Paris at the time and Gehry was using a lot of materials put together and using technology to create something thought of as impossible but made possible which was a computer program. Gehry was also thinking about the future of architecture because there were no designs like his before and now people have realised the possibilities of this kind of dramatic architecture. They both set out with different functions for their buildings however in the end the Eiffel tower is a tourist place now and so is the Guggenheim Museum. They both have curves and arches. 
2. Differences 
The differences between the two buildings firstly would be the designers, this is because they both used different methods of designing, mostly because they were different sorts of designers Eiffel was a bridge designer and had practical ideas. Where as Gehry was more of an artist with his dramatic very different creative efforts. The functions of the buildings were both different where The Eiffel Tower was designed for a fair and was then used as a radio tower, where as Guggenheim was designed to be a museum for people to interact with art and learn. The Eiffel tower is a lot taller and was designed to be the tallest building in the world at the time, where are the Guggenheim was designed to not interfere and not be overcasting other buildings but to kind of fit in with it’s height. 

Sunday 1 May 2011

Week 6-Landscape and the Sublime



'Wanderer in the mists' (1818) Caspar David Friedrich




'Untitled #2" (2002) Richard Misrach




 'Untitled # 394-03' (2003) Richard Misrach 




Richard Misrach's photography reflects the concept of the Sublime, from the Enlightenment.
Research Misrach's work by reading about his intentions, and also by looking at the work. Then answer the following questions;
  1. What and when was the Enlightenment?
Enlightenment is the era in Western philosophy, intellectual, scientific and cultural life, created upon the 18th century. Enlightenment was the establishment of people being able to challenge concepts that were traditional and and set in stone about the world, about man, society and nature which was dominated by Christianity. New ideas were accompanied by writing, printing, painting, music, sculpture, architecture and gardening.  For an example of Enlightenment thought in the seventeenth century are 
-Human history is largely a history of progress
  • Religious doctrines have no place in the understanding of the physical and human worlds
  • truth can be arrived at through empirical observation, the use of reason, and systematic doubt 
Enlightenment is summed up by some ideas that have been put together which are reason, empiricism, science, universalism, progress, individualism, toleration, freedom, uniformity of human nature, secularism. According to Immanuel Kant (writer of the essay Answering the Question: What Is Enlightenment?), “The Enlightenment was "Mankind's final coming of age, the emancipation of the human consciousness from an immature state of ignorance and error." 
  1. Define the concept of the Sublime.
Sublime is a form of expression if someone refers to your work or something you have or see as sublime it’s like calling your work divine. Other words like sublime are awe-inspiring, majestic, elevated, noble, lofty, exalted etc.. all these words are powerful, strong, extreme words. Sublime was translated into French in 1674, and put a considerable influence in the 18th century aesthetics, where beauty and sublimity are often paired. In this context the sublime often has a rather different meaning from what it has in Longinus, and this different meaning has also entered into our way of thinking. For example, in A Philosophical Enquiry into the Origin of Our Ideas of the Sublime and Beautiful (1757) Edmund Burke generates a conception of the sublime in connection with our encounter with nature as well as art. The sublime now becomes that which causes astonishment, `that state of the soul in which all its motions are suspended, with some degree of horror' (p. 95). http://www.selectedworks.co.uk/sublime.htmlThe sublime is a form of expression in literature in which the author refers to things in nature or art that affect the mind with a sense of overwhelming grandeur or irresistible power. It is calculated to inspire awe, deep reverence, or lofty emotion, by reason of its beauty, vastness, or grandeur.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sublime_(literary)
  1. How did the concept of the Sublime come out of the Enlightenment thought?
The concept of the sublime came out of the enlightenment thought by people using literary sublime in search of enlightenment. Also people decided to go against the church in the beginning out enlightenment because they wanted to explore the natural laws which governed the earth rather than listening to the bible. People began to love and appreciate the beauty of the world and nature for themselves rather than listening to what the church said was beauty. Out of this the concept of the sublime came out the enlightenment. 
  1. Discuss the subject matter, and aesthetic (look) of Misrach's work to identify the Sublime in his work. Add some more images of his work. 
The subject matter he uses in his work is idealistic in nice enriched colours like the beach, water and sky images, it makes the world look so vast with tiny people shown in it. That may not be his intention but that is how I see it. To me this makes his work show excellence and sublimity because for an example out of latest project “Desert Cantos” he captures the perfect lighting and the perfect scenery that everyone dreams of, such as the reflections of the clouds onto water in one of the images ‘Moonlake 2, California.’ In the image ‘Pyramid #5’ Misrach has captured a heavenly like lighting of the sun coming out of the dark clouds and beaming onto the water which to me is sublime and a perfect image it takes your breath away. 
  1. Identify some other artists or designers that work with ideas around the Sublime, from the Enlightenment era as well as contemporary artists.
Painters such as Caspar David Friedrich, Mark Rothko, Yves Klein, and James Turrell create sublime experiences for the viewer through seemingly simple combinations of abstracted color, light, and space. 


Mark Rothko, Untitled,1949, National Gallery of Art, Gift of The Mark Rothko Foundation, Inc., 1986.43.138 

Blue Monochrome 1961. Dry pigment in synthetic polymer medium on cotton over plywood, 6' 4 7/8" x 55 1/8" (195.1 x 140 cm). The Sidney and Harriet Janis Collection. © 2011 Artists Rights Society (ARS), New York / ADAGP, Paris
“Monochrome abstraction—the use of one color over an entire canvas—has been a strategy adopted by many painters wishing to challenge expectations of what an image can and should represent. Klein likened monochrome painting to an "open window to freedom." He worked with a chemist to develop his own particular brand of blue. Made from pure color pigment and a binding medium, it is called International Klein Blue. Klein adopted this hue as a means of evoking the immateriality and boundlessness of his own particular utopian vision of the world.” http://www.moma.org/collection/browse_results.php?criteria=O%3AAD%3AE%3A3137&page_number=4&template_id=1&sort_order=1

James Turrell, Roden Crater, AZ(Photo: Jeff Kozera, 1996) 
pastedGraphic.pdf
  1. How does Misrach's photography make you feel? Does it appeal to your imagination?
When I look at each individual image I feel kind of alone, yet at peace because in his images his colouring seems to have a gloomy tinge over them as well as having a vast space with small people in it. It makes you realise how big the world is and how beautiful, it also makes me feel that I should carry a camera everywhere with me to snap everyday beauty that is held as an even better memory that you can share as an image. he grasps nicely the suggestion of where people have been and left such as the track marks in the sand in 'Battleground #2' 

7. Add a Sublime image of your choice to your blog, which can be Art or just a Sublime photograph.
This is an image I took at a friends house on a chilly afternoon I like this image because it has not been adjusted in anyway to look better it is just how it was, which seems so surreal. I find it so exciting when the sky turns so fiery and you can still see the blue in the sky as well. 

http://books.google.co.nz/books?id=EujcNVAlcw4C&pg=PA80&lpg=PA80&dq=concept+of+sublime+coming+out+of+enlightenment&source=bl&ots=9aOgInwBLm&sig=LxOtodl2WeSKSOGsu-UZtTu05Co&hl=en&ei=a_u8Tf-BG4OisAOoyNXbBQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=3&ved=0CB8Q6AEwAg#v=onepage&q&f=false